WALLACE AND WOLF CHAPTER 1: THE UNDERSTANDING OF SOCIETY Sociologists do not come to the subject matter cold, their minds blank. Whatever the topic they approach the subject with certain assumptions they emphasize particular methods and they have particular questions that they want answered. This means that research is based on ways of looking at things for sociological theories advance the theories lay this out in an explicit and systematic way. they noted that because of the differences in various theories sociological theories may look like a group of perspectives with little in common except their general and formalizing approach and their concern with understanding human behavior. thing out the theories are made of concepts A CONCEPT is a word or symbol that represents a phenomenon, or a label we used to name and classify our perceptions and experiences, or an abstract idea generalized from particular instances. Examples: Durkheim's cconcept of anomie, or marx's concept of alienation are classic examples of sociological concepts Theories differ along several major dimensions: FIRST, deductive and inductive approaches, SECOND, methodologies methodologies are simply how we gather our data. There are different kinds of methodologies (list some) THIRD, their subject matter distinguish between macro sociology and microsociology. (functionalism and conflict. Our two approaches concerned with the overall characteristics of social structure and the general nature of social institutions. FOURTH, their assumptions underlying their approach assumptions refer to the taken for granted characteristics about the world and how it operates. For example theorists differ in whether they view human behavior as essentially determined and so in principle predictable, or whether they emphasize humans of creativity. The clearest contrast is between, on the one hand, functionalism and series of rational choice, and on the other symbolic interactionand phenomenology. Functionalists Cedar world as built around individual motives but they see human behavior has ultimately determined and so in principle easy to explain or fully explainable. Symbolic interaction, on the other hand, focuses on how people put together their social world. Functionalists assumed more or less explicitly that people's motives and behavior are largely a function of the social values they internalize. In other words people's basic purposes are formed by their birth into a particular society; they do not exist independently. Conflict theorists like contrast emphasize interests, especially the interests of powerful groups who impose them on less powerful groups. FIFTH, types of questions they ask about the material. TAKE A LOOK AT THE CHARTS, TABLE 1 -- ONE, ON PAGE 11. OBJECTIVES the final respect in which major perspectives in sociology deferred from each other is in their ultimate objectives in particular whether they aim at describing things at explaining things or at predicting things. ALL THEORIES IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES LIKE THE SCIENCES, ARE CONCERNED WITH INCREASING OUR COMPREHENSION OF THINGS WITH PROVIDING ACCOUNTS THAT MAKE US FEEL THAT WE NOW UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON TO A GREATER DEGREE THAN WE DID BEFORE. The fact that sociological theory does not form a cumulative body of work comparable to physics or even neoclassical economics does not mean that we have an impasse with one approach merely contradicting another. The test of the fairy is whether it helps us to understand and each of the theories and discourse shed light on a different aspect of human behavior.
Page maintained by: Jim Thomas - jthomas@sun.soci.niu.edu